Vivo X300 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S26
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S26 overall by 12 points (86 vs 74 out of 100).
- Vivo X300 Pro stands out on Memory RAM capacity: 16 GB, Storage capacity: 1,024 GB, Display Size: 6.78 in.
Vivo X300 Pro leads overall
Vivo X300 Pro
86
Samsung Galaxy S26
74
Why it stands out
- Memory RAM capacity: 16 GB
- Storage capacity: 1,024 GB
- Display Size: 6.78 in
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jul 2026.
Vivo X300 Pro
The Vivo X300 Pro is a flagship smartphone designed for power users who prioritize high-end mobile photography and robust battery life. It is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 processor and features a brilliant 6.78-inch LTPO OLED display. With its heavy-duty zoom camera and robust water protection, it aims to compete at the very top of the premium market.
Best for High-detail zoom and close-up macro mobile photographyBest for Outdoor enthusiasts needing a highly water-resistant device with a very bright sBest for Power users wanting high-speed 90W wired charging paired with strong overall bat
Pros
- Highly advanced triple-lens camera setup featuring a 200 MP periscope telephoto sensor
- Generous 6510 mAh battery capacity on the global variant for extended multi-day use
- Superb outdoor visibility with a display that peaks at 4500 nits
- Dual IP68 and IP69 ratings offering protection against both immersion and high-pressure water jets
Cons
- Relatively heavy in the hand, weighing 226 grams
- European model gets a substantially smaller 5440 mAh battery compared to the global version
- Lacks support for expandable storage options
Samsung Galaxy S26
The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a premium, compact smartphone running Android 16 with One UI 8.5, tailored for users who prefer a smaller form factor. Depending on the region, it is powered by either the 3nm Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or the 2nm Samsung Exynos 2600 processor. It features a remarkably slim 7.2mm profile, a 167-gram lightweight body, and a 4300 mAh battery.
Best for Gamers who want top-tier processing power in a smaller, highly portable sizeBest for Buyers looking for an ultra-slim, lightweight flagship phone that easily fits in
Pros
- Extremely thin and lightweight design measuring 7.2 mm in depth and weighing 167 grams
- Excellent processing and gaming performance powered by next-generation chipsets
- Equipped with modern Wi-Fi 7 support for fast wireless connectivity
Cons
- Subpar battery endurance that struggles to survive a full day of regular use
- Wired charging speeds are limited to a relatively slow 25W
- Unchanged camera hardware that can struggle when photographing moving subjects
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.
Vivo X300 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S26
Battery capacity
Larger cell — a hardware spec, not battery life
Vivo X300 Pro6,510 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S264,300 mAh
Capacity is the raw battery size. Real-world battery life depends just as much on the processor, software and display.
Physical Comparison
Weigh them up, then compare real dimensions in 3D
Vivo X300 ProSamsung Galaxy S26
Vivo X300 Pro is 59 g (35%) heavier than Samsung Galaxy S26.
Sponsored
Ad — helps keep Let's Compare free
Advertisement
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side