Honor Magic V6 vs Vivo X300 Pro
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Honor Magic V6 and Vivo X300 Pro are closely matched overall (within 1 point).
- Honor Magic V6 stands out on Display Size: 7.95 in, Cellular SIM type: Nano-SIM + eSIM, Weight: 219 g.
- Vivo X300 Pro counters with Display Pixel density: 452 PPI, Display Screen-to-body ratio: 94.85%, Rear camera aperture: 1.57.
Honor Magic V6 and Vivo X300 Pro are closely matched
Honor Magic V6
88
Vivo X300 Pro
87
Where Honor Magic V6 stands out
- Display Size: 7.95 in
- Cellular SIM type: Nano-SIM + eSIM
- Weight: 219 g
Where Vivo X300 Pro stands out
- Display Pixel density: 452 PPI
- Display Screen-to-body ratio: 94.85%
- Rear camera aperture: 1.57
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.
Honor Magic V6
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
Honor Magic V64,166,339
Vivo X300 Pro3,583,003
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Battery capacity
Larger cell — a hardware spec, not battery life
Honor Magic V66,660 mAh
Vivo X300 Pro6,510 mAh
Capacity is the raw battery size. Real-world battery life depends just as much on the processor, software and display.
Physical Comparison
Weigh them up, then compare real dimensions in 3D
Honor Magic V6Vivo X300 Pro
Vivo X300 Pro is 7 g (3%) heavier than Honor Magic V6.
Advertisement
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side