Vivo X300 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra overall by 10 points (87 vs 77 out of 100).
- Vivo X300 Pro stands out on Display Screen-to-body ratio: 94.85%, Front camera (megapixels): 50 MP, Front camera aperture: 2.
Vivo X300 Pro leads overall
Vivo X300 Pro
87
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
77
Why it stands out
- Display Screen-to-body ratio: 94.85%
- Front camera (megapixels): 50 MP
- Front camera aperture: 2
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.
Vivo X300 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Battery capacity
Larger cell — a hardware spec, not battery life
Vivo X300 Pro6,510 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra5,000 mAh
Capacity is the raw battery size. Real-world battery life depends just as much on the processor, software and display.
Physical Comparison
Weigh them up, then compare real dimensions in 3D
Vivo X300 ProSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Vivo X300 Pro is 12 g (6%) heavier than Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra.
Advertisement
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side