Vivo X300 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S22
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S22 overall by 14 points (86 vs 72 out of 100).
- Vivo X300 Pro stands out on Memory RAM capacity: 16 GB, Storage capacity: 1,024 GB, Display Size: 6.78 in.
Vivo X300 Pro leads overall
Vivo X300 Pro
86
Samsung Galaxy S22
72
Why it stands out
- Memory RAM capacity: 16 GB
- Storage capacity: 1,024 GB
- Display Size: 6.78 in
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jul 2026.
Vivo X300 Pro
The Vivo X300 Pro is a flagship smartphone designed for power users who prioritize high-end mobile photography and robust battery life. It is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 processor and features a brilliant 6.78-inch LTPO OLED display. With its heavy-duty zoom camera and robust water protection, it aims to compete at the very top of the premium market.
Best for High-detail zoom and close-up macro mobile photographyBest for Outdoor enthusiasts needing a highly water-resistant device with a very bright sBest for Power users wanting high-speed 90W wired charging paired with strong overall bat
Pros
- Highly advanced triple-lens camera setup featuring a 200 MP periscope telephoto sensor
- Generous 6510 mAh battery capacity on the global variant for extended multi-day use
- Superb outdoor visibility with a display that peaks at 4500 nits
- Dual IP68 and IP69 ratings offering protection against both immersion and high-pressure water jets
Cons
- Relatively heavy in the hand, weighing 226 grams
- European model gets a substantially smaller 5440 mAh battery compared to the global version
- Lacks support for expandable storage options
Samsung Galaxy S22
The Samsung Galaxy S22 series was released in 2022 and consists of models including the regular, Plus, Ultra, and a smaller core device. It is marketed as a premium smartphone offering flagship features for its time.
Best for primary smartphone useBest for users preferring a compact size
Pros
- Features an armor aluminum frame with Gorilla Glass Victus+ on both the front and back
- The display measures 6.1 inches and has a 120Hz refresh rate, providing smooth animations
- It includes IP68 rated water and dust resistance
- The dedicated ultrasonic fingerprint reader is reliable for waking the device
- The camera setup included a 50-megapixel main sensor and three times optical telephoto lens
Cons
- The design featured some curved sides compared to newer devices (Source 4)
- A performance throttling controversy was noted in early reports (Source 1)
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
Vivo X300 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S22
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
Vivo X300 Pro3,583,003
Samsung Galaxy S22813,961
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Battery capacity
Larger cell — a hardware spec, not battery life
Vivo X300 Pro6,510 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S223,700 mAh
Capacity is the raw battery size. Real-world battery life depends just as much on the processor, software and display.
Physical Comparison
Weigh them up, then compare real dimensions in 3D
Vivo X300 ProSamsung Galaxy S22
Vivo X300 Pro is 57 g (34%) heavier than Samsung Galaxy S22.
Sponsored
Ad — helps keep Let's Compare free
Advertisement
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side