Vivo X300 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Vivo X300 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are closely matched overall (within 2 points).
- Vivo X300 Pro stands out on Memory RAM capacity: 16 GB, Storage capacity: 1,024 GB, Display Screen-to-body ratio: 94.85%.
- Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counters with Display Size: 6.9 in, Display Resolution: 1440 × 3120 px, Display Pixel density: 498 PPI.
- Best value: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (from $1,299) — the strongest score-per-dollar of the two.
Vivo X300 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are closely matched
$1,399 at launch
Vivo X300 Pro
85
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
83
Best value: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ($1,299)
Where Vivo X300 Pro stands out
- Memory RAM capacity: 16 GB
- Storage capacity: 1,024 GB
- Display Screen-to-body ratio: 94.85%
Where Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra stands out
- Display Size: 6.9 in
- Display Resolution: 1440 × 3120 px
- Display Pixel density: 498 PPI
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jul 2026.
Vivo X300 Pro
The Vivo X300 Pro is a flagship smartphone designed for power users who prioritize high-end mobile photography and robust battery life. It is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9500 processor and features a brilliant 6.78-inch LTPO OLED display. With its heavy-duty zoom camera and robust water protection, it aims to compete at the very top of the premium market.
Best for High-detail zoom and close-up macro mobile photographyBest for Outdoor enthusiasts needing a highly water-resistant device with a very bright sBest for Power users wanting high-speed 90W wired charging paired with strong overall bat
Pros
- Highly advanced triple-lens camera setup featuring a 200 MP periscope telephoto sensor
- Generous 6510 mAh battery capacity on the global variant for extended multi-day use
- Superb outdoor visibility with a display that peaks at 4500 nits
- Dual IP68 and IP69 ratings offering protection against both immersion and high-pressure water jets
Cons
- Relatively heavy in the hand, weighing 226 grams
- European model gets a substantially smaller 5440 mAh battery compared to the global version
- Lacks support for expandable storage options
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
AI analysis isn't ready yet
We haven't generated an in-depth write-up for Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra yet. The specs, scores and strengths profile above still cover it — check back later for the AI summary.
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
Vivo X300 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
Vivo X300 Pro3,583,003
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra2,209,231
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Battery capacity
Larger cell — a hardware spec, not battery life
Vivo X300 Pro6,510 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra5,000 mAh
Capacity is the raw battery size. Real-world battery life depends just as much on the processor, software and display.
Physical Comparison
Weigh them up, then compare real dimensions in 3D
Vivo X300 ProSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Vivo X300 Pro is 8 g (4%) heavier than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra.
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side