Vivo X300 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy M32
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy M32 overall by 32 points (87 vs 55 out of 100).
- Vivo X300 Pro stands out on Memory RAM capacity: 16 GB, Storage capacity: 1,024 GB, Display Size: 6.78 in.
Vivo X300 Pro leads overall
Vivo X300 Pro
87
Samsung Galaxy M32
55
Why it stands out
- Memory RAM capacity: 16 GB
- Storage capacity: 1,024 GB
- Display Size: 6.78 in
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
Samsung Galaxy M32
The Samsung Galaxy M32 is a smartphone announced in June 2021, featuring a display that refreshes at 90 Hertz. It provides a package of features intended for users seeking an affordable yet capable device. The phone supports dual nanoSIM cards and includes both USB Type-C and a dedicated headphone jack.
Best for budget buyersBest for media consumption
Pros
- Features a 6.4 inch Super AMOLED Full HD+ display with a 90Hz refresh rate
- The battery capacity is noted at up to 6000mAh
- Includes various ports such as USB type-c, a headphone jack, and storage expansion slot
- Has a side-mounted fingerprint scanner for quick unlocking
Cons
- Camera performance is stated to be beaten by certain rivals at a similar price point
- The plastic frame and glossy finish attract fingerprints easily
- Some users noted occasional stutter or slow app loading times while using the phone
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.
Vivo X300 Pro
Samsung Galaxy M32
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
Vivo X300 Pro3,583,003
Samsung Galaxy M32204,000
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Battery capacity
Larger cell — a hardware spec, not battery life
Vivo X300 Pro6,510 mAh
Samsung Galaxy M325,000 mAh
Capacity is the raw battery size. Real-world battery life depends just as much on the processor, software and display.
Physical Comparison
Weigh them up, then compare real dimensions in 3D
Vivo X300 ProSamsung Galaxy M32
Vivo X300 Pro is 21 g (10%) heavier than Samsung Galaxy M32.
Sponsored
Ad — helps keep Let's Compare free
Advertisement
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side