Intel Core Ultra 9 386H vs Intel Core i9 12900F
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Intel Core i9 12900F leads Intel Core Ultra 9 386H overall by 17 points (71 vs 54 out of 100).
Intel Core i9 12900F leads overall
Intel Core i9 12900F
71
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
54
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
AI analysis isn't ready yet
We haven't generated an in-depth write-up for Intel Core Ultra 9 386H yet. The specs, scores and strengths profile above still cover it — check back later for the AI summary.
Intel Core i9 12900F
The Intel Core i9 12900F is a desktop CPU designed for users who require high computational power without needing integrated graphics. It utilizes Intel's 12th generation Alder Lake architecture, combining multiple specialized cores to handle diverse workloads.
Best for Content creationBest for Productivity rigsBest for High-performance gaming (with GPU)
Pros
- High core count supports demanding multitasking and intensive applications.
- Architecture design allows balanced performance across various compute loads.
- It provides strong general computing capability for desktop users.
Cons
- The 'F' designation indicates the lack of built-in video output, requiring a dedicated graphics card.
- Its generation is notable within Intel's long history of processor design cycles.
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Intel Core i9 12900F
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H44,000
Intel Core i9 12900F37,319
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side