AMD EPYC 9654 vs Intel Core i9 11900
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- AMD EPYC 9654 leads Intel Core i9 11900 overall by 31 points (64 vs 33 out of 100).
- AMD EPYC 9654 stands out on Core Specifications Cores: 96, Core Specifications Threads: 192, Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 320 W.
AMD EPYC 9654 leads overall
$11,805 at launch
AMD EPYC 9654
64
Intel Core i9 11900
33
Why it stands out
- Core Specifications Cores: 96
- Core Specifications Threads: 192
- Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 320 W
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
AMD EPYC 9654
The AMD EPYC 9654 is a high-core count server microprocessor designed for intensive computing tasks. It utilizes the Zen 4 microarchitecture to deliver significant parallel processing power and connectivity via enterprise-grade features. This processor is best suited for data centers, cloud infrastructure, and complex computational workloads.
Best for Cloud ComputingBest for High Performance ComputingBest for Data Analytics/AI Workloads
Pros
- Provides up to 96 cores per socket, enabling massive parallel processing capacity.
- Features advanced I/O capabilities, including extensive PCIe and support for CXL (Compute Express Link), which can improve overall system bandwidth.
- High memory channel support allows the processor to efficiently handle large data sets required by demanding applications.
Cons
- The high core count and specialized architecture make it unsuitable for end-user desktops or general personal computing tasks.
- Performance is optimized for maximizing throughput in complex server environments rather than single-threaded responsiveness.
Intel Core i9 11900
The Core i9 11900 is a high-performance Central Processing Unit (CPU) belonging to Intel’s mid-to-high-end lineup. It utilizes the Eleventh Generation architecture, designed for demanding tasks requiring extensive compute power. This processor is suitable for advanced users needing superior performance in applications like content creation or intense computational workloads.
Best for content creationBest for high-performance computingBest for enthusiast builds
Pros
- Part of the i9 series, indicating high performance capability within its generation
- The 11th generation signifies a specific development cycle of Intel microarchitecture
- High-end processors are generally targeted at demanding enthusiast and workstation users
Cons
- Its designation places it in an older microarchitectural family, which may lack compatibility or peak performance compared to newer generations.
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
AMD EPYC 9654
Intel Core i9 11900
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
AMD EPYC 9654126,045
Intel Core i9 1190023,015
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Sponsored
Ad — helps keep Let's Compare free
Advertisement
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side