AMD EPYC 9654 vs Intel Core i7 11375H
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- AMD EPYC 9654 leads Intel Core i7 11375H overall by 31 points (64 vs 33 out of 100).
- AMD EPYC 9654 stands out on Core Specifications Cores: 96, Core Specifications Threads: 192, Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 320 W.
AMD EPYC 9654 leads overall
$11,805 at launch
AMD EPYC 9654
64
Intel Core i7 11375H
33
Why it stands out
- Core Specifications Cores: 96
- Core Specifications Threads: 192
- Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 320 W
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
AMD EPYC 9654
The AMD EPYC 9654 is a high-core count server microprocessor designed for intensive computing tasks. It utilizes the Zen 4 microarchitecture to deliver significant parallel processing power and connectivity via enterprise-grade features. This processor is best suited for data centers, cloud infrastructure, and complex computational workloads.
Best for Cloud ComputingBest for High Performance ComputingBest for Data Analytics/AI Workloads
Pros
- Provides up to 96 cores per socket, enabling massive parallel processing capacity.
- Features advanced I/O capabilities, including extensive PCIe and support for CXL (Compute Express Link), which can improve overall system bandwidth.
- High memory channel support allows the processor to efficiently handle large data sets required by demanding applications.
Cons
- The high core count and specialized architecture make it unsuitable for end-user desktops or general personal computing tasks.
- Performance is optimized for maximizing throughput in complex server environments rather than single-threaded responsiveness.
Intel Core i7 11375H
The Intel Core i7 11375H is a mobile processor designed for demanding computing tasks. It belongs to the 11th generation of Intel Core chips and utilizes a hybrid architecture combining performance (P) and efficiency (E) cores. This chip is generally suited for users needing reliable, high-performance operation in portable devices.
Best for content creationBest for engineering workloadsBest for mobile workstations
Pros
- Offers a balance of core count through its combination of P-cores and E-cores
- Designed with an 'H' designation, indicating it is built for higher performance mobile applications
- The 11th generation incorporates modern architectural improvements over previous generations
Cons
- Being a mobile chip type (H), its high power consumption may challenge thermal design in thinner laptops
- Its architecture, while advanced at launch, is an older design compared to the latest CPU lines available.
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
AMD EPYC 9654
Intel Core i7 11375H
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
AMD EPYC 9654126,045
Intel Core i7 11375H12,371
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Sponsored
Ad — helps keep Let's Compare free
Advertisement
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side