AMD EPYC 9654 vs Intel Core i5 1240U
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- AMD EPYC 9654 leads Intel Core i5 1240U overall by 23 points (64 vs 41 out of 100).
- AMD EPYC 9654 stands out on Core Specifications Cores: 96, Core Specifications Threads: 192, Core Specifications Base Frequency: 2.4 GHz.
AMD EPYC 9654 leads overall
$11,805 at launch
AMD EPYC 9654
64
Intel Core i5 1240U
41
Why it stands out
- Core Specifications Cores: 96
- Core Specifications Threads: 192
- Core Specifications Base Frequency: 2.4 GHz
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
AMD EPYC 9654
The AMD EPYC 9654 is a high-core count server microprocessor designed for intensive computing tasks. It utilizes the Zen 4 microarchitecture to deliver significant parallel processing power and connectivity via enterprise-grade features. This processor is best suited for data centers, cloud infrastructure, and complex computational workloads.
Best for Cloud ComputingBest for High Performance ComputingBest for Data Analytics/AI Workloads
Pros
- Provides up to 96 cores per socket, enabling massive parallel processing capacity.
- Features advanced I/O capabilities, including extensive PCIe and support for CXL (Compute Express Link), which can improve overall system bandwidth.
- High memory channel support allows the processor to efficiently handle large data sets required by demanding applications.
Cons
- The high core count and specialized architecture make it unsuitable for end-user desktops or general personal computing tasks.
- Performance is optimized for maximizing throughput in complex server environments rather than single-threaded responsiveness.
Intel Core i5 1240U
The Intel Core i5 1240U is a mobile processor designed for mainstream portable computing tasks. It falls under the widely adaptable Alder Lake architecture, giving it efficiency and solid performance characteristics. This CPU is best suited for general productivity work in laptops where power consumption and battery life are key concerns.
Best for general productivityBest for daily computingBest for students and basic home office users
Pros
- Benefit from the Alder Lake architecture's blend of performance and low power draw
- Suitable for multi-core workloads due to its modern design structure
- Offers good operating stability for common daily computing tasks
Cons
- Being a 'U' series processor indicates it prioritizes efficiency over peak sustained performance
- Performance on highly demanding professional applications may be limited by its power profile
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
AMD EPYC 9654
Intel Core i5 1240U
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
AMD EPYC 9654126,045
Intel Core i5 1240U14,323
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Sponsored
Ad — helps keep Let's Compare free
Advertisement
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side