AMD EPYC 9654 vs Intel Core i3 12100
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- AMD EPYC 9654 leads Intel Core i3 12100 overall by 26 points (64 vs 38 out of 100).
- AMD EPYC 9654 stands out on Core Specifications Cores: 96, Core Specifications Threads: 192, Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 320 W.
- Best value: Intel Core i3 12100 (from $122) — the strongest score-per-dollar of the two.
AMD EPYC 9654 leads overall
$11,805 at launch
AMD EPYC 9654
64
Intel Core i3 12100
38
Best value: Intel Core i3 12100 ($122)
Why it stands out
- Core Specifications Cores: 96
- Core Specifications Threads: 192
- Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 320 W
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
AMD EPYC 9654
The AMD EPYC 9654 is a high-core count server microprocessor designed for intensive computing tasks. It utilizes the Zen 4 microarchitecture to deliver significant parallel processing power and connectivity via enterprise-grade features. This processor is best suited for data centers, cloud infrastructure, and complex computational workloads.
Best for Cloud ComputingBest for High Performance ComputingBest for Data Analytics/AI Workloads
Pros
- Provides up to 96 cores per socket, enabling massive parallel processing capacity.
- Features advanced I/O capabilities, including extensive PCIe and support for CXL (Compute Express Link), which can improve overall system bandwidth.
- High memory channel support allows the processor to efficiently handle large data sets required by demanding applications.
Cons
- The high core count and specialized architecture make it unsuitable for end-user desktops or general personal computing tasks.
- Performance is optimized for maximizing throughput in complex server environments rather than single-threaded responsiveness.
Intel Core i3 12100
The Core i3 12100 is an entry-level CPU belonging to Intel's 12th generation Alder Lake family. It was designed for users needing reliable performance in everyday computing tasks without dedicating a budget toward high-end processing power. This architecture makes it suitable for general productivity, student needs, and basic home use.
Best for General productivityBest for Student useBest for Basic home office
Pros
- Built on the modern Alder Lake architecture by Intel
- Provides solid performance capacity for daily-use applications like web browsing or document creation
- The 12th generation platform generally supports updated features and connectivity improvements
Cons
- Its three core count limits its ability to handle intensive, multi-threaded workloads compared to higher-tier processors
- More powerful CPUs may be unnecessary for users needing excellent performance in basic home computing tasks
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
AMD EPYC 9654
Intel Core i3 12100
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
AMD EPYC 9654126,045
Intel Core i3 1210013,843
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Sponsored
Ad — helps keep Let's Compare free
Advertisement
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side