Apple M4 Pro (14 Core) vs AMD EPYC 9654
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- Apple M4 Pro (14 Core) leads AMD EPYC 9654 overall by 5 points (69 vs 64 out of 100).
- Apple M4 Pro (14 Core) stands out on Core Specifications Base Frequency: 4.5 GHz, Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 4.5 GHz, Core Specifications Lithography Process: 3 nm.
Apple M4 Pro (14 Core) leads overall
Apple M4 Pro (14 Core)
69
AMD EPYC 9654
64
Why it stands out
- Core Specifications Base Frequency: 4.5 GHz
- Core Specifications Maximum Frequency: 4.5 GHz
- Core Specifications Lithography Process: 3 nm
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
Apple M4 Pro (14 Core)
The Apple M4 Pro is a System-on-a-Chip (SoC) developed by Apple, featuring specialized components for computing, graphics, and neural processing. With variations allowing 12 or 14 CPU cores and 16 or 20 GPU cores, it is positioned for mid-to-high-end users who require substantial power for complex creative workflows.
Best for Professional video editingBest for High-fidelity graphics renderingBest for AI and machine learning development
Pros
- Includes a higher core count in both the CPU (up to 14) and GPU (up to 20) compared to base M4 models, enhancing versatility
- Offers significantly improved memory bandwidth via LPDDR5X technology, reaching up to 273 GB/s with larger configurations (Source 1)
- The dedicated NPU is highly capable, supporting AI workloads due to its advanced processing power metrics (Source 1)
Cons
- Its primary function is tied to specific Apple hardware platforms (e.g., MacBook Pro), limiting standalone flexibility for other manufacturers
- While powerful, the M4 Pro's performance benchmarks mean it operates within a highly integrated ecosystem that can restrict upgradeability (Source 1)
AMD EPYC 9654
The AMD EPYC 9654 is a high-core count server microprocessor designed for intensive computing tasks. It utilizes the Zen 4 microarchitecture to deliver significant parallel processing power and connectivity via enterprise-grade features. This processor is best suited for data centers, cloud infrastructure, and complex computational workloads.
Best for Cloud ComputingBest for High Performance ComputingBest for Data Analytics/AI Workloads
Pros
- Provides up to 96 cores per socket, enabling massive parallel processing capacity.
- Features advanced I/O capabilities, including extensive PCIe and support for CXL (Compute Express Link), which can improve overall system bandwidth.
- High memory channel support allows the processor to efficiently handle large data sets required by demanding applications.
Cons
- The high core count and specialized architecture make it unsuitable for end-user desktops or general personal computing tasks.
- Performance is optimized for maximizing throughput in complex server environments rather than single-threaded responsiveness.
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
Apple M4 Pro (14 Core)
AMD EPYC 9654
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
Apple M4 Pro (14 Core)38,124
AMD EPYC 9654126,045
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Sponsored
Ad — helps keep Let's Compare free
Advertisement
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side