AMD EPYC 9654 vs Apple M2 Pro 10 Core
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- AMD EPYC 9654 leads Apple M2 Pro 10 Core overall by 24 points (64 vs 40 out of 100).
- AMD EPYC 9654 stands out on Core Specifications Cores: 96, Core Specifications Threads: 192, Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 320 W.
AMD EPYC 9654 leads overall
$11,805 at launch
AMD EPYC 9654
64
Apple M2 Pro 10 Core
40
Why it stands out
- Core Specifications Cores: 96
- Core Specifications Threads: 192
- Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 320 W
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
AMD EPYC 9654
The AMD EPYC 9654 is a high-core count server microprocessor designed for intensive computing tasks. It utilizes the Zen 4 microarchitecture to deliver significant parallel processing power and connectivity via enterprise-grade features. This processor is best suited for data centers, cloud infrastructure, and complex computational workloads.
Best for Cloud ComputingBest for High Performance ComputingBest for Data Analytics/AI Workloads
Pros
- Provides up to 96 cores per socket, enabling massive parallel processing capacity.
- Features advanced I/O capabilities, including extensive PCIe and support for CXL (Compute Express Link), which can improve overall system bandwidth.
- High memory channel support allows the processor to efficiently handle large data sets required by demanding applications.
Cons
- The high core count and specialized architecture make it unsuitable for end-user desktops or general personal computing tasks.
- Performance is optimized for maximizing throughput in complex server environments rather than single-threaded responsiveness.
Apple M2 Pro 10 Core
The Apple M2 Pro is a specialized System-on-a-Chip designed for professional computing within the Mac lineup. It features both high-performance and energy-efficient cores, making it suitable for users who require significant graphical power alongside robust CPU performance. This chip provides enhanced benefits over standard consumer models, appealing to creative professionals and engineers.
Best for Video EditingBest for Content CreationBest for Professional Design
Pros
- Features a dedicated 19-core GPU setup (or similar configurations) compared to base chips, offering substantial graphics capability. (Source 1)
- Utilizes high-bandwidth LPDDR5 memory with significantly increased bus bandwidth for improved data throughput across all components. (Source 1)
- The architecture includes both high-performance and energy-efficient CPU cores, optimizing performance while maintaining power efficiency. (Source 1)
- Supports professional media codecs, including 8K resolution and various Apple ProRes standards. (Source 1)
Cons
- Its advanced capabilities mean it is optimized for specific high-end computing tasks rather than general light use. (General Knowledge)
- The chip is associated with higher-tier Mac models, limiting its compatibility with more entry-level machines. (Source 1)
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
AMD EPYC 9654
Apple M2 Pro 10 Core
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
AMD EPYC 9654126,045
Apple M2 Pro 10 Core21,718
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Sponsored
Ad — helps keep Let's Compare free
Advertisement
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side