AMD EPYC 9654 vs Apple M1 Pro 8 Core - CPUs Comparison Guide | Let's Compare
AMD EPYC 9654 vs Apple M1 Pro 8 Core
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
AMD EPYC 9654 leads Apple M1 Pro 8 Core overall by 24 points (64 vs 40 out of 100).
AMD EPYC 9654 stands out on Core Specifications Cores: 96, Core Specifications Threads: 192, Core Specifications Base Frequency: 2.4 GHz.
AMD EPYC 9654 leads overall
$11,805 at launch
AMD EPYC 9654
64
Apple M1 Pro 8 Core
40
Why it stands out
Core Specifications Cores: 96
Core Specifications Threads: 192
Core Specifications Base Frequency: 2.4 GHz
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
AMD EPYC 9654
The AMD EPYC 9654 is a high-core count server microprocessor designed for intensive computing tasks. It utilizes the Zen 4 microarchitecture to deliver significant parallel processing power and connectivity via enterprise-grade features. This processor is best suited for data centers, cloud infrastructure, and complex computational workloads.
Best for Cloud ComputingBest for High Performance ComputingBest for Data Analytics/AI Workloads
Pros
Provides up to 96 cores per socket, enabling massive parallel processing capacity.
Features advanced I/O capabilities, including extensive PCIe and support for CXL (Compute Express Link), which can improve overall system bandwidth.
High memory channel support allows the processor to efficiently handle large data sets required by demanding applications.
Cons
The high core count and specialized architecture make it unsuitable for end-user desktops or general personal computing tasks.
Performance is optimized for maximizing throughput in complex server environments rather than single-threaded responsiveness.
The Apple M1 Pro is an advanced, power-efficient system-on-a-chip designed for professional computing tasks. It incorporates a blended CPU architecture featuring both high-performance and energy-efficient cores. This processor is built for users who require substantial processing capability without excessive power draw.
Best for video productionBest for software developmentBest for complex content creation
Pros
Offers significant performance gains over previous architectures due to its hybrid core design (M1 Pro) in the Apple silicon family.
The chip integrates graphics, processing, and memory controllers onto a single die, improving system-level efficiency.
High-bandwidth LPDDR5 memory is utilized for substantial memory speed, supporting intensive workloads.
Cons
Compared to the highest-tier M1 Max variants, users select fewer total cores on the base models.
Its discontinuation signals that newer, more powerful professional silicon upgrades are available from Apple’s lineup.
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Sponsored
Ad — helps keep Let's Compare free
Advertisement
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side
Core Specifications
Feature
AMD EPYC 9654
Apple M1 Pro 8 Core
Cores
96
8
Threads
192
8
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Base Power Consumption
320 W
30 W
Maximum Frequency
3.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Maximum Power Consumption
400 W
30 W
L1 Cache
6,144 KB
2,380 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
28 MB
L3 Cache
384 MB
8 MB
Lithography Process
5 nm
5 nm
Is unlocked
No
No
Integrated Graphics
Feature
AMD EPYC 9654
Apple M1 Pro 8 Core
Model
N/A
N/A
Benchmark
Feature
AMD EPYC 9654
Apple M1 Pro 8 Core
PassMark CPU Mark
126,045
17,198
Specification Note
Specifications are compiled from official manufacturer data and other reliable internet sources. Some features may vary by region or model configuration.