AMD EPYC 7713 vs Intel Xeon W 1390
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- AMD EPYC 7713 leads Intel Xeon W 1390 overall by 36 points (83 vs 47 out of 100).
- AMD EPYC 7713 stands out on Core Specifications Cores: 64, Core Specifications Threads: 128, Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 225 W.
AMD EPYC 7713 leads overall
AMD EPYC 7713
83
Intel Xeon W 1390
47
Why it stands out
- Core Specifications Cores: 64
- Core Specifications Threads: 128
- Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 225 W
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
AMD EPYC 7713
The AMD EPYC line is a brand of multi-core x86-64 microprocessors designed exclusively for highly demanding server applications. These processors are engineered with advanced features—such as higher core counts, expanded I/O capacity, and support for ECC memory—that differentiate them from general desktop CPUs. They are primarily suited for data center infrastructure, enterprise computing, and specialized large-scale compute clusters.
Best for Data Center InfrastructureBest for High-Performance Computing (HPC)Best for Virtualization & Cloud Services
Pros
- Designed specifically for server workloads within the EPYC family framework
- Offers advanced connectivity through multiple PCI Express lanes and support for technologies like CXL (Compute Express Link)
- Scales up to high core counts per socket, supporting large-scale multi-core deployments
- Supports extensive memory bandwidth via support for DDR5 and 12 memory channels
Cons
- Due to their target market, these processors require specialized chassis and cooling solutions typical of data centers
- The sheer scale of their I/O capabilities can make them overkill or inefficient for entry-level computing tasks
Intel Xeon W 1390
The Intel Xeon W processor line is designed for professional or high-performance workstations, offering computational power beyond standard consumer CPUs. It provides a balance of core count and clock speed suitable for specialized computing tasks outside of basic office work. This range appeals to professionals requiring reliable, multi-threaded performance.
Best for WorkstationsBest for CAD/DesignBest for Video Editing
Pros
- Designed specifically for workstation applications, suggesting stability in demanding environments.
- The 'W' designation generally aligns this processor with high computational throughput needs.
Cons
- These processors are intended for professional machines and may require specialized motherboard support.
- Their performance benefits are best realized when running complex, multi-threaded workloads.
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.
AMD EPYC 7713
Intel Xeon W 1390
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
AMD EPYC 771385,165
Intel Xeon W 139023,902
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Advertisement
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side