AMD EPYC 7713 vs Intel Xeon W 1370
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- AMD EPYC 7713 leads Intel Xeon W 1370 overall by 36 points (83 vs 47 out of 100).
- AMD EPYC 7713 stands out on Core Specifications Cores: 64, Core Specifications Threads: 128, Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 225 W.
AMD EPYC 7713 leads overall
AMD EPYC 7713
83
Intel Xeon W 1370
47
Why it stands out
- Core Specifications Cores: 64
- Core Specifications Threads: 128
- Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 225 W
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
AMD EPYC 7713
The AMD EPYC line is a brand of multi-core x86-64 microprocessors designed exclusively for highly demanding server applications. These processors are engineered with advanced features—such as higher core counts, expanded I/O capacity, and support for ECC memory—that differentiate them from general desktop CPUs. They are primarily suited for data center infrastructure, enterprise computing, and specialized large-scale compute clusters.
Best for Data Center InfrastructureBest for High-Performance Computing (HPC)Best for Virtualization & Cloud Services
Pros
- Designed specifically for server workloads within the EPYC family framework
- Offers advanced connectivity through multiple PCI Express lanes and support for technologies like CXL (Compute Express Link)
- Scales up to high core counts per socket, supporting large-scale multi-core deployments
- Supports extensive memory bandwidth via support for DDR5 and 12 memory channels
Cons
- Due to their target market, these processors require specialized chassis and cooling solutions typical of data centers
- The sheer scale of their I/O capabilities can make them overkill or inefficient for entry-level computing tasks
Intel Xeon W 1370
The Intel Xeon W processor line is designed for professional workstations, providing substantial compute power beyond typical consumer CPUs. It offers a balance of high core count potential and reliability necessary for demanding computational tasks. This CPU is suitable for engineering, rendering, data processing, and other specialized workstation applications.
Best for Workstation renderingBest for CAD/CAE computingBest for Scientific simulation
Pros
- Designed specifically for powerful computing workloads in professional settings.
- Part of the robust lineup that includes various generations for system builders.
- Offers sustained performance necessary for multi-threaded tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.
Cons
- Performance and feature set are heavily dependent on its specific generation (e.g., Comet Lake vs W-2400).
- Requires a workstation motherboard compatible with the correct socket type.
- The architecture may be significantly outdated compared to modern CPUs, impacting efficiency.
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.
AMD EPYC 7713
Intel Xeon W 1370
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
AMD EPYC 771385,165
Intel Xeon W 137023,908
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Sponsored
Ad — helps keep Let's Compare free
Advertisement
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side