AMD EPYC 7713 vs Intel Xeon E 2388G
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- AMD EPYC 7713 leads Intel Xeon E 2388G overall by 34 points (64 vs 30 out of 100).
- AMD EPYC 7713 stands out on Core Specifications Cores: 64, Core Specifications Threads: 128, Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 225 W.
AMD EPYC 7713 leads overall
AMD EPYC 7713
64
Intel Xeon E 2388G
30
Why it stands out
- Core Specifications Cores: 64
- Core Specifications Threads: 128
- Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 225 W
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
AMD EPYC 7713
The AMD EPYC line is a brand of multi-core x86-64 microprocessors designed exclusively for highly demanding server applications. These processors are engineered with advanced features—such as higher core counts, expanded I/O capacity, and support for ECC memory—that differentiate them from general desktop CPUs. They are primarily suited for data center infrastructure, enterprise computing, and specialized large-scale compute clusters.
Best for Data Center InfrastructureBest for High-Performance Computing (HPC)Best for Virtualization & Cloud Services
Pros
- Designed specifically for server workloads within the EPYC family framework
- Offers advanced connectivity through multiple PCI Express lanes and support for technologies like CXL (Compute Express Link)
- Scales up to high core counts per socket, supporting large-scale multi-core deployments
- Supports extensive memory bandwidth via support for DDR5 and 12 memory channels
Cons
- Due to their target market, these processors require specialized chassis and cooling solutions typical of data centers
- The sheer scale of their I/O capabilities can make them overkill or inefficient for entry-level computing tasks
Intel Xeon E 2388G
This source provides a comprehensive list of Intel Xeon microprocessors, categorized by their architectural generation. It documents the evolution and lineage of processors intended for server and workstation use.
Best for researchBest for historical tracking
Pros
- The resource lists thousands of historical and modern Xeon models across different generations (P6-based through Granite Rapids)
- Processors are organized logically, allowing users to track changes in core technology like NetBurst, Core, and various current architectures.
Cons
- The information is presented as a list of historical data rather than detailed product specifications for any single chip.
- It requires navigating multiple sections to find modern processor details.
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.
AMD EPYC 7713
Intel Xeon E 2388G
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
AMD EPYC 771385,165
Intel Xeon E 2388G23,844
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side