AMD EPYC 7713 vs Intel Xeon E 2324G
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- AMD EPYC 7713 leads Intel Xeon E 2324G overall by 31 points (64 vs 33 out of 100).
- AMD EPYC 7713 stands out on Core Specifications Cores: 64, Core Specifications Threads: 128, Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 225 W.
AMD EPYC 7713 leads overall
AMD EPYC 7713
64
Intel Xeon E 2324G
33
Why it stands out
- Core Specifications Cores: 64
- Core Specifications Threads: 128
- Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 225 W
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
AMD EPYC 7713
The AMD EPYC line is a brand of multi-core x86-64 microprocessors designed exclusively for highly demanding server applications. These processors are engineered with advanced features—such as higher core counts, expanded I/O capacity, and support for ECC memory—that differentiate them from general desktop CPUs. They are primarily suited for data center infrastructure, enterprise computing, and specialized large-scale compute clusters.
Best for Data Center InfrastructureBest for High-Performance Computing (HPC)Best for Virtualization & Cloud Services
Pros
- Designed specifically for server workloads within the EPYC family framework
- Offers advanced connectivity through multiple PCI Express lanes and support for technologies like CXL (Compute Express Link)
- Scales up to high core counts per socket, supporting large-scale multi-core deployments
- Supports extensive memory bandwidth via support for DDR5 and 12 memory channels
Cons
- Due to their target market, these processors require specialized chassis and cooling solutions typical of data centers
- The sheer scale of their I/O capabilities can make them overkill or inefficient for entry-level computing tasks
Intel Xeon E 2324G
The Intel Xeon E 2324G is a processor designed for mainstream computing environments, often utilizing technology suitable for small to medium-scale servers. It provides performance capabilities within the broader range of the low-power and entry-level workstation class.
Best for Small business serversBest for Digital signage systemsBest for General departmental workstations
Pros
- Designed for efficiency, which is beneficial for systems requiring stable power consumption over long periods.
- Part of the Xeon E series, indicating it supports professional workloads alongside general productivity tasks.
- Its architecture places it in a market segment focused on value while maintaining corporate reliability.
Cons
- As an entry-level chip, it may have limited core counts or lower throughput compared to more advanced server variants.
- Performance is designed for general office and computing tasks rather than highly demanding, mission-critical loads.
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.
AMD EPYC 7713
Intel Xeon E 2324G
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
AMD EPYC 771385,165
Intel Xeon E 2324G10,603
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Sponsored
Ad — helps keep Let's Compare free
Advertisement
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side