AMD EPYC 7713 vs Intel Core Ultra 5
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- AMD EPYC 7713 leads Intel Core Ultra 5 overall by 29 points (64 vs 35 out of 100).
- AMD EPYC 7713 stands out on Core Specifications Cores: 64, Core Specifications Threads: 128, Core Specifications Base Frequency: 2 GHz.
AMD EPYC 7713 leads overall
AMD EPYC 7713
64
Intel Core Ultra 5
35
Why it stands out
- Core Specifications Cores: 64
- Core Specifications Threads: 128
- Core Specifications Base Frequency: 2 GHz
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jul 2026.
AMD EPYC 7713
The AMD EPYC line is a brand of multi-core x86-64 microprocessors designed exclusively for highly demanding server applications. These processors are engineered with advanced features—such as higher core counts, expanded I/O capacity, and support for ECC memory—that differentiate them from general desktop CPUs. They are primarily suited for data center infrastructure, enterprise computing, and specialized large-scale compute clusters.
Best for Data Center InfrastructureBest for High-Performance Computing (HPC)Best for Virtualization & Cloud Services
Pros
- Designed specifically for server workloads within the EPYC family framework
- Offers advanced connectivity through multiple PCI Express lanes and support for technologies like CXL (Compute Express Link)
- Scales up to high core counts per socket, supporting large-scale multi-core deployments
- Supports extensive memory bandwidth via support for DDR5 and 12 memory channels
Cons
- Due to their target market, these processors require specialized chassis and cooling solutions typical of data centers
- The sheer scale of their I/O capabilities can make them overkill or inefficient for entry-level computing tasks
Intel Core Ultra 5
The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is a mid-range desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture as part of the Core Ultra 200 series. Designed for mainstream desktop users, this chip prioritizes energy efficiency improvements over its predecessors. Despite these power delivery refinements, it faces steep competition from alternative options in the market that often provide better value for performance.
Best for Users building a new system who prioritize improved energy efficiency over maxim
Pros
- Improved power efficiency compared to older Intel generations
- Belongs to the updated, modernized Arrow Lake platform
Cons
- Faces tough competition from alternative processors priced both above and below it
- Struggles to stand out as a clear recommendation for gaming or system upgrades
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.
AMD EPYC 7713
Intel Core Ultra 5
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
AMD EPYC 771385,165
Intel Core Ultra 527,000
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Sponsored
Ad — helps keep Let's Compare free
Advertisement
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side