AMD EPYC 7713 vs Intel Core i7 1195G7
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- AMD EPYC 7713 leads Intel Core i7 1195G7 overall by 37 points (83 vs 46 out of 100).
- AMD EPYC 7713 stands out on Core Specifications Cores: 64, Core Specifications Threads: 128, Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 225 W.
AMD EPYC 7713 leads overall
AMD EPYC 7713
83
Intel Core i7 1195G7
46
Why it stands out
- Core Specifications Cores: 64
- Core Specifications Threads: 128
- Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 225 W
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
AMD EPYC 7713
The AMD EPYC line is a brand of multi-core x86-64 microprocessors designed exclusively for highly demanding server applications. These processors are engineered with advanced features—such as higher core counts, expanded I/O capacity, and support for ECC memory—that differentiate them from general desktop CPUs. They are primarily suited for data center infrastructure, enterprise computing, and specialized large-scale compute clusters.
Best for Data Center InfrastructureBest for High-Performance Computing (HPC)Best for Virtualization & Cloud Services
Pros
- Designed specifically for server workloads within the EPYC family framework
- Offers advanced connectivity through multiple PCI Express lanes and support for technologies like CXL (Compute Express Link)
- Scales up to high core counts per socket, supporting large-scale multi-core deployments
- Supports extensive memory bandwidth via support for DDR5 and 12 memory channels
Cons
- Due to their target market, these processors require specialized chassis and cooling solutions typical of data centers
- The sheer scale of their I/O capabilities can make them overkill or inefficient for entry-level computing tasks
Intel Core i7 1195G7
The Intel Core i7 1195G7 is a low-power processor designed for mobile computing applications. This chip incorporates features intended for general single-board or thin-client operational roles. It is best suited for users who prioritize energy efficiency and moderate performance rather than intensive computational tasks.
Best for General productivityBest for Web browsingBest for Media consumption
Pros
- Provides sufficient graphical capability for routine graphical user interfaces and media consumption.
- Designed with low power consumption, which contributes to better battery life in mobile systems.
Cons
- Represents a lower-power option of the i7 lineup, suggesting limitations in extreme computational performance.
- Its architecture places it within the 11th generation family, representing an older design compared to current offerings.
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.
AMD EPYC 7713
Intel Core i7 1195G7
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
AMD EPYC 771385,165
Intel Core i7 1195G711,055
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Advertisement
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side