AMD EPYC 7713 vs Apple M2 Pro 10 Core
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- AMD EPYC 7713 leads Apple M2 Pro 10 Core overall by 23 points (83 vs 60 out of 100).
- AMD EPYC 7713 stands out on Core Specifications Cores: 64, Core Specifications Threads: 128, Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 225 W.
AMD EPYC 7713 leads overall
AMD EPYC 7713
83
Apple M2 Pro 10 Core
60
Why it stands out
- Core Specifications Cores: 64
- Core Specifications Threads: 128
- Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 225 W
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
AMD EPYC 7713
The AMD EPYC line is a brand of multi-core x86-64 microprocessors designed exclusively for highly demanding server applications. These processors are engineered with advanced features—such as higher core counts, expanded I/O capacity, and support for ECC memory—that differentiate them from general desktop CPUs. They are primarily suited for data center infrastructure, enterprise computing, and specialized large-scale compute clusters.
Best for Data Center InfrastructureBest for High-Performance Computing (HPC)Best for Virtualization & Cloud Services
Pros
- Designed specifically for server workloads within the EPYC family framework
- Offers advanced connectivity through multiple PCI Express lanes and support for technologies like CXL (Compute Express Link)
- Scales up to high core counts per socket, supporting large-scale multi-core deployments
- Supports extensive memory bandwidth via support for DDR5 and 12 memory channels
Cons
- Due to their target market, these processors require specialized chassis and cooling solutions typical of data centers
- The sheer scale of their I/O capabilities can make them overkill or inefficient for entry-level computing tasks
Apple M2 Pro 10 Core
The Apple M2 Pro is a specialized System-on-a-Chip designed for professional computing within the Mac lineup. It features both high-performance and energy-efficient cores, making it suitable for users who require significant graphical power alongside robust CPU performance. This chip provides enhanced benefits over standard consumer models, appealing to creative professionals and engineers.
Best for Video EditingBest for Content CreationBest for Professional Design
Pros
- Features a dedicated 19-core GPU setup (or similar configurations) compared to base chips, offering substantial graphics capability. (Source 1)
- Utilizes high-bandwidth LPDDR5 memory with significantly increased bus bandwidth for improved data throughput across all components. (Source 1)
- The architecture includes both high-performance and energy-efficient CPU cores, optimizing performance while maintaining power efficiency. (Source 1)
- Supports professional media codecs, including 8K resolution and various Apple ProRes standards. (Source 1)
Cons
- Its advanced capabilities mean it is optimized for specific high-end computing tasks rather than general light use. (General Knowledge)
- The chip is associated with higher-tier Mac models, limiting its compatibility with more entry-level machines. (Source 1)
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.
AMD EPYC 7713
Apple M2 Pro 10 Core
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
AMD EPYC 771385,165
Apple M2 Pro 10 Core21,718
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Advertisement
Review Videos
Hand-picked expert reviews for each product
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side