AMD EPYC 7713 vs Apple M2 10 Core
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- AMD EPYC 7713 leads Apple M2 10 Core overall by 24 points (64 vs 40 out of 100).
- AMD EPYC 7713 stands out on Core Specifications Cores: 64, Core Specifications Threads: 128, Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 225 W.
AMD EPYC 7713 leads overall
AMD EPYC 7713
64
Apple M2 10 Core
40
Why it stands out
- Core Specifications Cores: 64
- Core Specifications Threads: 128
- Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 225 W
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
AMD EPYC 7713
The AMD EPYC line is a brand of multi-core x86-64 microprocessors designed exclusively for highly demanding server applications. These processors are engineered with advanced features—such as higher core counts, expanded I/O capacity, and support for ECC memory—that differentiate them from general desktop CPUs. They are primarily suited for data center infrastructure, enterprise computing, and specialized large-scale compute clusters.
Best for Data Center InfrastructureBest for High-Performance Computing (HPC)Best for Virtualization & Cloud Services
Pros
- Designed specifically for server workloads within the EPYC family framework
- Offers advanced connectivity through multiple PCI Express lanes and support for technologies like CXL (Compute Express Link)
- Scales up to high core counts per socket, supporting large-scale multi-core deployments
- Supports extensive memory bandwidth via support for DDR5 and 12 memory channels
Cons
- Due to their target market, these processors require specialized chassis and cooling solutions typical of data centers
- The sheer scale of their I/O capabilities can make them overkill or inefficient for entry-level computing tasks
Apple M2 10 Core
The Apple M2 is a System-on-a-chip designed by Apple for use across its range of computers and tablets. This chip uses the ARM architecture and features an integrated CPU, GPU, and Neural Engine. It targets users needing efficient, powerful processing power in a modern, unified computing environment.
Best for General productivityBest for Casual content creationBest for Efficient daily computing
Pros
- The architecture provides dedicated hardware support for neural network tasks, improving machine learning performance and efficiency (Source 1).
- It uses LPDDR5 memory integrated with the SoC, allowing all components to share high-speed memory efficiently (Source 1).
- The chip features a hybrid core design incorporating both high-performance and energy-efficient CPU cores for balanced power usage (Source 1).
Cons
- This specific chip variant does not support the advanced connectivity standards of higher-end M2 Pro or M2 Max models (Source 1).
- It is part of a generational lineup that has since been succeeded by newer processor generations (Source 1).
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.
AMD EPYC 7713
Apple M2 10 Core
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
AMD EPYC 771385,165
Apple M2 10 Core15,426
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Sponsored
Ad — helps keep Let's Compare free
Advertisement
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side