AMD EPYC 7713 vs Apple M2
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- AMD EPYC 7713 leads Apple M2 overall by 28 points (83 vs 55 out of 100).
- AMD EPYC 7713 stands out on Core Specifications Cores: 64, Core Specifications Threads: 128, Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 225 W.
AMD EPYC 7713 leads overall
AMD EPYC 7713
83
Apple M2
55
Why it stands out
- Core Specifications Cores: 64
- Core Specifications Threads: 128
- Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 225 W
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
AMD EPYC 7713
The AMD EPYC line is a brand of multi-core x86-64 microprocessors designed exclusively for highly demanding server applications. These processors are engineered with advanced features—such as higher core counts, expanded I/O capacity, and support for ECC memory—that differentiate them from general desktop CPUs. They are primarily suited for data center infrastructure, enterprise computing, and specialized large-scale compute clusters.
Best for Data Center InfrastructureBest for High-Performance Computing (HPC)Best for Virtualization & Cloud Services
Pros
- Designed specifically for server workloads within the EPYC family framework
- Offers advanced connectivity through multiple PCI Express lanes and support for technologies like CXL (Compute Express Link)
- Scales up to high core counts per socket, supporting large-scale multi-core deployments
- Supports extensive memory bandwidth via support for DDR5 and 12 memory channels
Cons
- Due to their target market, these processors require specialized chassis and cooling solutions typical of data centers
- The sheer scale of their I/O capabilities can make them overkill or inefficient for entry-level computing tasks
Apple M2
The Apple M2 is a system on a chip (SoC) developed by Apple for use in their range of Macintosh and other computing devices. This architecture integrates the central processing unit (CPU) and graphics processing unit (GPU) alongside other components into a single, powerful chipset. It is designed for users who require high performance across various demanding applications, including creative professional workflows.
Best for Creative ProfessionalsBest for Modern Computing TasksBest for Apple Ecosystem Users
Pros
- Incorporates advanced memory features, supporting LPDDR5 memory up to 6400 MT/s protocols in its variants (Source 2)
- Features a highly integrated design that powers multiple product types, ranging from MacBooks to iPad tablets and mixed reality headsets (Source 1, Source 2)
- The architecture is based on the ARM instruction set, providing efficiency for modern computing tasks (Source 2)
Cons
- While powerful, specific performance metrics are relative to its predecessor (M1) or advanced variants like M2 Max/Ultra (Source 2)
- Its primary function is limited to Apple's own device ecosystem, requiring users to buy macOS-compatible hardware for full functionality (Inferred from Source 1 & 2)
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.
AMD EPYC 7713
Apple M2
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
AMD EPYC 771385,165
Apple M213,500
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Advertisement
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side