AMD EPYC 7713 vs Apple M1
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- AMD EPYC 7713 leads Apple M1 overall by 30 points (83 vs 53 out of 100).
- AMD EPYC 7713 stands out on Core Specifications Cores: 64, Core Specifications Threads: 128, Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 225 W.
AMD EPYC 7713 leads overall
AMD EPYC 7713
83
Apple M1
53
Why it stands out
- Core Specifications Cores: 64
- Core Specifications Threads: 128
- Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 225 W
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
AMD EPYC 7713
The AMD EPYC line is a brand of multi-core x86-64 microprocessors designed exclusively for highly demanding server applications. These processors are engineered with advanced features—such as higher core counts, expanded I/O capacity, and support for ECC memory—that differentiate them from general desktop CPUs. They are primarily suited for data center infrastructure, enterprise computing, and specialized large-scale compute clusters.
Best for Data Center InfrastructureBest for High-Performance Computing (HPC)Best for Virtualization & Cloud Services
Pros
- Designed specifically for server workloads within the EPYC family framework
- Offers advanced connectivity through multiple PCI Express lanes and support for technologies like CXL (Compute Express Link)
- Scales up to high core counts per socket, supporting large-scale multi-core deployments
- Supports extensive memory bandwidth via support for DDR5 and 12 memory channels
Cons
- Due to their target market, these processors require specialized chassis and cooling solutions typical of data centers
- The sheer scale of their I/O capabilities can make them overkill or inefficient for entry-level computing tasks
Apple M1
The Apple M1 is a System on a Chip (SoC) created by Apple Inc. primarily intended for use in their suite of Macintosh computers and iPad Pro tablets. This chip provided a powerful, integrated alternative to traditional CPUs, making it suitable for users who require strong performance while maintaining portability and efficiency.
Best for Creative professionalsBest for General productivity and multi-tasking
Pros
- Offers high performance relative to its power consumption, which is ideal for demanding computing tasks.
- Integration of multiple components (CPU, GPU, NPU, memory) onto a single die improves system efficiency and speed.
- The architecture supports the usage across various Apple devices, from minimalist desktops to powerful laptops.
Cons
- It is an older generation chip compared to newer product lines (M1 Pro/Max), potentially limiting future hardware upgrade paths for certain users.
- While highly functional, some advanced use cases may require more specialized or higher-core count chips available in later iterations.
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.
AMD EPYC 7713
Apple M1
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
AMD EPYC 771385,165
Apple M110,500
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Advertisement
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side