AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- AMD EPYC 7713 leads AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X overall by 21 points (83 vs 62 out of 100).
- AMD EPYC 7713 stands out on Core Specifications L1 Cache: 8,128 KB, Core Specifications L3 Cache: 512 MB, Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 85,165.
AMD EPYC 7713 leads overall
AMD EPYC 7713
83
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
62
Why it stands out
- Core Specifications L1 Cache: 8,128 KB
- Core Specifications L3 Cache: 512 MB
- Benchmark PassMark CPU Mark: 85,165
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
AMD EPYC 7713
The AMD EPYC line is a brand of multi-core x86-64 microprocessors designed exclusively for highly demanding server applications. These processors are engineered with advanced features—such as higher core counts, expanded I/O capacity, and support for ECC memory—that differentiate them from general desktop CPUs. They are primarily suited for data center infrastructure, enterprise computing, and specialized large-scale compute clusters.
Best for Data Center InfrastructureBest for High-Performance Computing (HPC)Best for Virtualization & Cloud Services
Pros
- Designed specifically for server workloads within the EPYC family framework
- Offers advanced connectivity through multiple PCI Express lanes and support for technologies like CXL (Compute Express Link)
- Scales up to high core counts per socket, supporting large-scale multi-core deployments
- Supports extensive memory bandwidth via support for DDR5 and 12 memory channels
Cons
- Due to their target market, these processors require specialized chassis and cooling solutions typical of data centers
- The sheer scale of their I/O capabilities can make them overkill or inefficient for entry-level computing tasks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is a high-core count, x86-64 microprocessor designed for demanding professional computing tasks. It belongs to AMD's line of robust desktop processors, making it suitable for users needing extensive computational power. Its architecture focuses on scalability and performance over standard consumer usage.
Best for Workstation PCsBest for Video EditingBest for Scientific Simulation
Pros
- Designed as a high-end processor, suggesting superior multi-threaded capability (general knowledge).
- It is classified within the Threadripper segment, known for its suitability in complex professional workstations.
- The overall line of processors includes various generation identifiers through history, indicating continuous development and specialization into compute tasks.
Cons
- Being a high-power workstation chip often requires more complex cooling solutions than standard CPUs (general knowledge).
- Its specific focus on professional work and core count places it at the higher end of the market spectrum.
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Pre-filled with launch prices where known — enter today's price for an up-to-date check. Use the same currency for both.
AMD EPYC 7713
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
AMD EPYC 771385,165
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X56,784
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Sponsored
Ad — helps keep Let's Compare free
Advertisement
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side