AMD EPYC 7713 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Verdict
Our overall take, at a glance
Key takeaways
- AMD EPYC 7713 leads AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 overall by 37 points (64 vs 27 out of 100).
- AMD EPYC 7713 stands out on Core Specifications Cores: 64, Core Specifications Threads: 128, Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 225 W.
AMD EPYC 7713 leads overall
AMD EPYC 7713
64
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
27
Why it stands out
- Core Specifications Cores: 64
- Core Specifications Threads: 128
- Core Specifications Base Power Consumption: 225 W
In-depth analysisAI
AI-generated from the cited sources — may be incomplete or inaccurate; verify important details before deciding · generated Jun 2026.
AMD EPYC 7713
The AMD EPYC line is a brand of multi-core x86-64 microprocessors designed exclusively for highly demanding server applications. These processors are engineered with advanced features—such as higher core counts, expanded I/O capacity, and support for ECC memory—that differentiate them from general desktop CPUs. They are primarily suited for data center infrastructure, enterprise computing, and specialized large-scale compute clusters.
Best for Data Center InfrastructureBest for High-Performance Computing (HPC)Best for Virtualization & Cloud Services
Pros
- Designed specifically for server workloads within the EPYC family framework
- Offers advanced connectivity through multiple PCI Express lanes and support for technologies like CXL (Compute Express Link)
- Scales up to high core counts per socket, supporting large-scale multi-core deployments
- Supports extensive memory bandwidth via support for DDR5 and 12 memory channels
Cons
- Due to their target market, these processors require specialized chassis and cooling solutions typical of data centers
- The sheer scale of their I/O capabilities can make them overkill or inefficient for entry-level computing tasks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a specialized central processing unit (CPU) designed for high-performance computing tasks. Its architecture suggests it is intended for power users and professionals, rather than typical consumer desktop builds.
Best for WorkstationsBest for Professional Computing
Pros
- Designed specifically as a Threadripper processor, indicating suitability for demanding workloads.
- The product's existence in the CPU category confirms its role as a core computational unit.
Cons
- No detailed specifications (like clock speed or core count) are available beyond its model name, limiting real-world performance assessment.
Value for Money
Which is the better deal for the price
Enter today's price for each product to see which offers better value. Use the same currency for both.
AMD EPYC 7713
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Performance
Higher benchmark score = faster
AMD EPYC 771385,165
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 192022,066
Benchmark score — a measured indicator of raw performance, not a guarantee of real-world speed.
Sponsored
Ad — helps keep Let's Compare free
Advertisement
Detailed Specifications
The full spec sheet, side by side